Okefenokee Swamp Essay

dowses dismiss be seen in various perspectives and can carry on opposite atmospheres associated with the individual inundate. The deuce departures on the Okefenokee Swamp both stick cardinal different atmospheres and t geniuss for the sop, nearly as if it was dickens different submerges. The power example of phrasing, detail and figurative style conveys how the swamp in the start passage is more than inviting and safe versus the swamp in the countenance passage which is displayed in a more vicious tone.The pens aim of diction in the first passage and the moment passage regarding the swamp is extremely different from one another. Throughout the first passage the occasion uses diction such as primitive, festooned and exotic to pass the swamp. The actors nominal tone and book of account choice helps convey that the swamp is a sedate and safe environment that is appealing to others as soundly as to the author. The diction helps support as if the author is t rying to persuade others to come to this swamp and fuck its beauty Unlike the first passage, in the indorse passage the author uses diction such as unfathomable, unconquerable and misery of life to convey the atmosphere of this swamp. The author sees the swamp in the hour passage in a more venomous and dark light that almost seems to be repellent the reader.The tone the author holds is almost as if he is trying to repel the reader from coming and see the swamp. It is negative and does not display any of the attributes that be associated with the swamp instead it is very critical and focuses on all the peculiarities of the swamp. The word choice that is used in both the passages varies from one another and conveys different atmospheres for the swamp. expound is a major factor throughout the two passages that helps distinguish the swamps in the passages from one another. In the first passage the author uses detail that have coercive context such as, Saucer-shaped depression of approximately 25 miles wide and 40 miles long that covers an area of more than 600 square miles. This detail holds a revealing and formal tone that relays a pleasant atmosphere. It also has an tempting tone that persuades the reader to come visit the swamp and explore its vastness. In the backpassage the author uses details such as, Four hundred and cardinal thousand acres of stinging, biting and boring insects. Although the guerilla passage is also describing the enormous land size it is presented in a much more leering and unappealing way.The author uses various literary devices throughout the two passages to delegate that he appreciates one swamp more than the other. In the first passage the author uses personification to expand and emphasize the beauty of the swamp. It states, foreign flowers. Among them floating hearts. Lilies. And rare orchards abound, the floating hearts help convey an atmosphere of peace and pleasantry that attracts the readers attention as tumefy a s persuades them to come visit the swamp. In the second passage the author uses a simile to show the distaste and lack of appreciation they held for the second swamp.The author describes the swamp like some hellish zoological garden almost conveying as if the swamp was both readers nightmare. The figurative language the author uses in the second passage is primarily centre on terrible the reader and persuading them not to come to the swamp and deposit in the comforts of their own home. Unlike in the first passage where the figurate language was solely focused on inviting the reader to visit the swamp and wonder the beauty and serenity the swamp had to offer. The author holds two very different tones when discussing the different swamps.The author uses different devices throughout the passages to create and convey a certain(p) tone for each swamp. In the first passage the swamp is seen as something that holds beauty and is inviting unlike in the second passage where the swamp s eems more malicious and repelling. The author uses various levels of diction, detail and figurative language to convey the tone and attitude they had toward each of the respective swamps, almost making it seem as if it were two different swamps entirely.